The main resemblance between the two agreements is that they both set restrictions on the government's power. A further resemblance is that they are both written treaties that outline what governments may and cannot do. In the 1200s, the concept of limiting a government was unique. Now with social media, cell phones, and online forums, it is impossible to have any form of real control over how people think about you or your organization.
Treaties are legal documents in which one country agrees to follow certain rules by another country. Countries use treaties to solve problems and advance their interests together. For example, countries work together to limit nuclear arms development because it is in both countries' best interest to have no more than 100 nuclear weapons. Tying their hands by entering into a treaty is one way for them to achieve this goal.
In order for a treaty to be valid it must be agreed to by both countries' legislatures and signed by the leaders of each nation. Once these steps have been taken, the treaty can never be repealed. It becomes part of the law of the land and applies to both members of the alliance alike.
When the United States formed its own government in 1789, it was necessary for them to create an official document that listed the rights everyone living in the new country would be granted.
The intended goal of the two texts is the most visible resemblance between them. Both of these Bills of Rights are deliberately intended to update each nation's constitution and serve as living texts that set out numerous legal issues, including rights and liberties. The original text of both bills is almost exactly the same, although there are a few changes that have been made since they were first drafted.
One difference between the two bills is that the British version is referred to as "An Act to amend the law in relation to certain guarantees contained in the bill of rights 1689." The American version does not include this reference to the British bill of rights, instead it simply states that the rights and freedoms described therein are guaranteed to everyone in the United States. Another difference is that the American bill of rights begins with a preamble which explains why some people call it a "Preamble" bill of rights.
These are just two examples of many differences between the two versions of these important documents. It is clear that they were not copied from one another; instead they were inspired by the same ideas during the late 18th century in order to provide a way for their respective countries to protect their citizens' rights.
In conclusion, we can say that the English Bill of Rights and the US Bill of Rights are similar in purpose; that is, they both aim to protect individuals' rights.
The Primary Distinction The Bill of Rights is sandwiched between the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The constitution is defined as a right that grants the state, federal, and municipal governments restricted power. The Bill of Rights, on the other hand, is the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution. This statute protects our liberty. It limits the government's power by saying what it can do and not do.
Here are the 10 Amendments to the Constitution:
1. First Amendment - Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion Without Restriction
2. Second Amendment - Right to Bear Arms
3. Third Amendment - No Soldier's Home without Consent of Owner
4. Fourth Amendment - Warrantless Searches and Seizures Are Prohibited
5. Fifth Amendment - No Self-Incrimination Clause (But See Below)
6. Sixth Amendment - Right to Counsel
7. Eighth Amendment - Cruel And Unusual Punishment For Felonies
8. Ninth Amendment - Right Of The People To Be Free From Unreasonable Search And Seizure
9. Tenth Amendment - Powers Not Delegated To The Federal Government Must Remain With The States